An Optimized UAV Flight Path Planning Method Based on Urban Low-Altitude Navigation Knowledge Graph
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract. With the rapid growth of the low-altitude economy, path planning for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in complex urban low-altitude environments has become increasingly critical. However, urban low-altitude scenarios are influenced by buildings, meteorological conditions, regulatory restrictions and numerous factors. Traditional path planning methods struggle to effectively consider the impact of multiple constraints, making it challenging to provide effective and interpretable decision support for flight operations. This study proposes an optimized UAV flight path planning method based on an Urban Low-Altitude Navigation Knowledge Graph (ULAN-KG). Utilizing the knowledge graph, it structures the association between low-altitude flight route elements and low-altitude flight constraint factors in the urban space. The experiment selects a densely built area of Beijing for validation, where the proposed method is compared with traditional algorithms. The experimental results show that the A* algorithm improved by ULAN-KG can effectively avoid flight segments affected by strong wind conditions. When conflicting with controlled airspace events, the path planning results prioritize avoiding no-fly zones. This approach offers efficient and reliable technical support for UAV applications in complex urban low-altitude scenarios, such as logistics and emergency response.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- An Optimized UAV Flight Path Planning Method Based on Urban Low-Altitude Navigation Knowledge Graph
- Date Crossref
- 26/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Copernicus GmbH
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.