A multilevel ensemble model for predicting mutation types in bladder cancer
Rattachement africain : us, in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: In urinary bladder cancer, early diagnosis plays a key role for effective patient management. Moreover, accurate prediction of genetic mutations plays a critical role in identifying biomarkers for prognosis and therapy. METHODS: Mutation types and other details were collected from publicly available datasets of human bladder cancer cell lines. A multilevel ensemble model was designed by integrating an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with a Random Forest (RF) classifier. The model was trained and validated on DNA sequence data to predict mutation types, specifically base pair insertions and deletions. Performance was compared against traditional machine learning models including SVM, naive Bayes, and decision trees. RESULTS: The proposed ensemble model achieved nearly 95% prediction accuracy, significantly outperforming conventional approaches. The integration of ANN and RF improved classification robustness and reliability in mutation type prediction. This study presents the development of a predictive model for mutation detection in bladder cancer using an AI-based approach. CONCLUSION: This novel study highlights the potential of AI techniques for early detection of mutations in urinary bladder cancer. The highly accurate prediction capability of the developed model offers promise for identifying diagnostic and prognostic mutational landscapes to guide future therapeutic strategies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A multilevel ensemble model for predicting mutation types in bladder cancer
- Date Crossref
- 02/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.