Impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on biomarkers of cystic fibrosis hepatobiliary involvement in the PUSH study
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Objectives The impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) on cystic fibrosis (CF) hepatobiliary involvement (CFHBI) is uncertain. The goal of this study was to investigate the changes in key liver parameters in PUSH study participants who started ETI compared to those who did not (noETI). Methods PUSH was a prospective observational study of persons with CF (pwCF) (3–12 yo at PUSH entry). Linear mixed effect model (LMEM) with one knot tested if ETI changed the slope of trajectories of clinical parameters by comparing ETI to noETI. Index time (IT) for ETI was ETI start and time of ETI availability for noETI. Time zero in the LMEM was index time. Results One hundred forty‐seven participants (104 ETI, 43 noETI). At IT, the groups were similar, for age, and liver parameters. Mean duration of ETI use was 22 months. The annual rate of change over time after IT in ETI compared to noETI was significantly improved for FEV 1 % pre (+3.4/yr p = 0.02) and wt z score (+0.06/yr, p = 0.006). There was improvement for ETI vs noETI for GGT (−15%/yr, p = 0.01) and ALT (−12%/yr, p = 0.02). Participants with CFHBI on ETI demonstrated similar trends and also had improvements in GGT and GGT to platelet ratio (GPR), but there were no differences in liver stiffness or US classification changes. Conclusions GGT and GPR improve in pwCF and CFHBI who received ETI compared to noETI. There were no changes in other liver parameters. This suggests an early signal for positive impact on CFHBI, but no early improvement in fibrosis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on biomarkers of cystic fibrosis hepatobiliary involvement in the PUSH study
- Date Crossref
- 26/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.