Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Evaluation of a single-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration service pre–, intra–, and post–COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
8Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Single-stage management of concomitant cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis consists of performing laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) at the same time as laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study aimed to evaluate the delivery of our single-stage LC + LCBDE service pre - , intra -, and post - COVID-19 pandemic and assess the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of this complex approach. METHODS: Between April 2016 and February 2024, a total of 237 consecutive patients underwent the single-stage approach of LC + LCBDE for the management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Patients were divided into three groups: pre-pandemic (April 2016 - February 2020, n = 144),intra-pandemic (March 2020 - December 2021, n = 37), and post-pandemic (January 2022 - February 2024, n = 56). All patients were assessed with preoperative liver function tests (LFTs) and abdominal imaging, including ultrasound, computed tomography, and/or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Data such as demographics, investigations, intraoperative findings, and postoperative outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The median age of the 237 patients was 56 (43-71) years, and 154 (65.0%) of them were female patients. Clinical features at presentation included abnormal LFTs (n = 77, 32.5%), jaundice (n = 57, 24.1%), pancreatitis (n = 51, 21.5%), and common bile duct dilatation (n = 49, 20.7%). Before the pandemic, there was a higher percentage of ultrasound scans (88.2% vs 78.4% vs 66.1%; P = 0.068) and lower percentage of MRCPs (29.2% vs 35.1% vs 58.9%; P = 0.002) performed compared with those during intra- and post-pandemic, respectively. Ultrasound imaging had a markedly higher overall false negative rate for cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis compared to MRCP imaging (58.0% vs 11.4%). There was a significant increase in the use of ultrathin (≤3 mm) choledochoscopes after the start of the pandemic (45.1% vs 95.7%; P < 0.001) and a higher number of proximal common hepatic duct views obtained (47.2% vs 64.5%; P = 0.018). There was no difference in length of stay or postoperative complications between the groups. Although the LCBDE case volume was lower after the start of the pandemic, the caseload increased thereafter and started to recover toward pre-pandemic levels of approximately 30 cases per year. CONCLUSIONS: After the pandemic, there was a shift away from ultrasound imaging toward MRCP imaging, as well as a change in the size of choledochoscopes used. The single-stage approach of LC + LCBDE has been shown to be a safe and resilient service despite the pandemic, providing further clinical support for the implementation of the procedure in centers where the local expertise is available.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Evaluation of a single-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration service pre–, intra–, and post–COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study
Date Crossref
04/11/2025
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Gallbladder and Bile Duct DisordersMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesAppendicitis Diagnosis and Management

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.