Dynamic Transitions for Fast Joint Acquisition and Reconstruction of CEST‐Rex$$ {R}_{ex} $$ and T1$$ {T}_1 $$
Rattachement africain : at, de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Purpose This work proposes a method for the simultaneous estimation of the exchange‐dependent relaxation rate and the longitudinal relaxation time from a single acquisition. Methods A novel acquisition scheme was developed that combines CEST saturation with an inversion pulse and a Look‐Locker readout to capture the magnetization evolution starting from the inverse transient Z‐spectrum. The corresponding signal model, derived from the Bloch‐McConnell equations, describes both the transient Z‐spectrum and the Look‐Locker dynamics. A model‐based reconstruction approach is employed to jointly estimate and . The proposed method was validated using a numerical phantom and benchmarked against conventional CEST and Look‐Locker mapping in a phantom and in vivo on a clinical 3T scanner. Results The joint estimation approach demonstrated strong agreement with ground truth and conventional methods across a wide range of and CEST parameters. The acquisition time was reduced by 20%–30% compared to standard CEST protocols, while providing a higher signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) in parameter maps. Conclusion The proposed technique enables robust and efficient simultaneous quantification of CEST and in a single acquisition. It improves parameter map quality and reduces scan time, making it suitable for both phantom and in vivo imaging across a wide range of physiological conditions.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Dynamic Transitions for Fast Joint Acquisition and Reconstruction of CEST‐Rex$$ {R}_{ex} $$ and T1$$ {T}_1 $$
- Date Crossref
- 25/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.