EGPA disease burden in Europe and US: evidence from real-world clinical practice
Résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a rare vasculitis affecting small-to-medium blood vessels with multisystem organ involvement. This retrospective, observational, real-world study characterised the EGPA disease burden. Methods: Data drawn from the Adelphi Real World EGPA Disease Specific ProgrammeTM, a cross-sectional survey of physicians and patients (pts) in Europe and US conducted between July–December 2023 were analysed descriptively. Physicians who managed ≥2 pts with EGPA reported demographics, symptoms, organ damage, asthma exacerbations and hospitalisations for their next 4–5 consecutively consulting pts (≥10 years old, with a physician-confirmed EGPA diagnosis). Results: Overall, 121 physicians provided data on 503 pts. Mean (SD) pt age was 50 (15) years, 50% were male, 89% were White and 22% required caregiver support. Pts had a mean (SD) of 3 (3) symptoms at data capture, the most common shown in the Figure. 72% of pts had physician-determined EGPA-induced organ damage, commonly affecting the pulmonary system (Figure). In the past year, 72/406 (18%) pts had been hospitalised, 51/72 (71%) due to EGPA complications. Of 277 pts (55%) with concomitant asthma, 83 (30%) had an asthma exacerbation in the past year; of those, 20 (24%) were hospitalised. Conclusion: Pts with EGPA have substantial disease burden, impacting multiple organs, with high rates of asthma exacerbations and hospitalisations. erj;66/suppl_69/PA3667/F1 F1 F1
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- EGPA disease burden in Europe and US: evidence from real-world clinical practice
- Date Crossref
- 27/09/2025
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.