The impact of long-term conditions on pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: Individuals attending pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) often live with >1 long-term condition (LTC) which can magnify symptom burden. Aim: To determine whether the amount of LTC affects exercise tolerance, quality of life, and symptom scores before and after PR. Methods: Outcomes from PR service data at Glenfield hospital, Leicester (Jan-Nov 2024) assessed immediately pre- and post-PR included incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT), quality of life (EQ-5D), and symptoms of breathlessness (MRC dyspnoea), depression (PHQ-9), and anxiety (GAD7). Participants were categorised based on number of LTC. Results: 380 adults (67.1±10.8 years; 51.5% female) were categorised as having 1 (n=28), 2 (n=62), 3 (n=91), 4 (n=76), or 5+ (n=123) LTC. No differences were observed across groups for age (p=0.488), sex (p=0.059), ethnicity (p=0.288), FEV1 (p=0.927), or EQ-5D (p=0.325), but were observed for baseline ISWT distance (Fig 1.), MRC dyspnoea, PHQ-9, and GAD-7 (all p<0.001). Those with greater LTC counts had reduced ISWT and greater symptom scores. Differences in baseline questionnaire scores were attributable to significant differences between those with 2 and 4, and 2 and 5+ LTC. Changes in these outcomes following PR did not statistically differ across LTC groups. Conclusion: Whilst those with more LTC showed reduced exercise tolerance and worse symptoms at baseline, the magnitude of improvements following PR were similar across LTC groups. erj;66/suppl_69/PA1997/F1 F1 F1
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The impact of long-term conditions on pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes
- Date Crossref
- 27/09/2025
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.