NICE Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Asthma in Children
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: NICE guidelines propose four stages where asthma can be diagnosed: 1) fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) ≥ 35ppb, 2) bronchodilator reversibility (BDR) ≥ 12% and/or ≥ 10% of pred FEV1, 3) peak expiratory flow variability (PEFv) ≥ 20%, and 4a) sensitisation to house dust mite (HDM) and/or 4b) raised IGE with eosinophils > 0.5 x 109 per litre. Aim: Assess the sensitivity and specificity at each stage of the NICE diagnostic algorithm in RADicA, a prospective study of diagnostic methods for untreated people referred from primary care with symptoms of asthma. Methods: Reference standard was determined by a panel of asthma specialists using clinical history, physical examination, spirometry, BDR, PEFv, bronchial challenge, allergy testing, blood eosinophils, and response to 8 weeks ICS treatment. 135 children had a definitive diagnostic outcome (50% female; mean (SD) age 10 (3) y, 101 (75%) had asthma). Results: Performance at each stage of the NICE algorithm is given in the table. 20% of participants were incorrectly diagnosed compared to the specialist panel, 11% with asthma were missed. 9% received a false positive diagnosis, mostly with sensitisation to HDM as the only positive test. Using the IGE + eosin instead of HDM sensitisation in the final stage improves the specificity of the algorithm. Conclusion: The NICE algorithm provides reasonable sensitivity; however, caution should be made making a diagnosis based on HDM alone. erj;66/suppl_69/PA3779/F1 F1 F1
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- NICE Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Asthma in Children
- Date Crossref
- 27/09/2025
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.