Stable ILD as a predictor of survival in CTD
Rattachement africain : no, ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: The impact of various definitions of disease progression on survival in connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) has been well studied. However, the prognostic value of stable ILD remains underexplored. Objective: To evaluate the frequency of stable ILD and its impact on transplant-free survival (TFS) in CTD-ILD patients. Method: We conducted a prospective study of CTD-ILD at Oslo University Hospital with baseline and 12-month assessments. Stability was defined using one or more of the following criteria: stable respiratory symptoms, absolute FVC decline <5%, absolute DLCO decline <10%, and stable ILD on HRCT. Symptomatic stability was determined through detailed patient history. TFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression with the landmark method. Results: Of 103 patients, 37 (36%) met all stability criteria, and 74 (72%) had stable respiratory symptoms. TFS was significantly better in patients with stable respiratory symptoms (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05–0.84, p=0.03). In contrast, stable FVC (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.06–1.28, p=0.1), stable DLCO (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.05–3.57, p=0.4), stable HRCT (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.16–2.60, p=0.5), and combined stability criteria (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.03–2.35, p=0.2) were not significantly associated with TFS. Conclusion: In this CTD-ILD cohort, stable respiratory symptoms emerged as a strong predictor of transplant-free survival, outperforming stability in FVC, DLCO, and HRCT findings. erj;66/suppl_69/PA6104/F1 F1 F1
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Stable ILD as a predictor of survival in CTD
- Date Crossref
- 27/09/2025
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.