Real-world evidence from the INSIGHTS-ILD registry: Impact of INBUILD criteria on disease progression and therapy modifications
Résumé fourni par la source
INSIGHTS-ILD (DRKS00027389) is a prospective registry at 35 German expert centers providing real-world insights into fibrosing interstitial lung disease (fILD). Inclusion criteria include interstitial lung fibrosis >10% on HRCT, DLCO ≤80% predicted, and active anti-inflammatory and/or antifibrotic therapy. To date, 826 patients were included. At baseline, 408 (49.4%) received anti-inflammatory therapy, 158 (19.1%) antifibrotic therapy, and 260 (31.5%) both. During follow-up, 60 (14.7%) initially on anti-inflammatory therapy modified treatment, with 56 transitioning to combination therapy. Among antifibrotic patients, 21 (13.3%) changed therapy, mostly (18 patients) to combination therapy. In the combination group, 41 (15.8%) changed therapy, with 28 stopping antifibrotic treatment. Data on INBUILD criteria for the 24 months prior to registry inclusion were available for 682 patients. Time-to-event analysis showed a significant difference in time to first therapy change or death between patients with at least one INBUILD criterion at baseline and those without (p<0.0001). However, no significant difference was observed in time to therapy modification or death when stratified by baseline therapy (anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic, or combination). In conclusion, INBUILD criteria at baseline predict disease progression within 12 months and are linked to a higher rate of therapy change. erj;66/suppl_69/PA2994/F1 F1 F1
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Real-world evidence from the INSIGHTS-ILD registry: Impact of INBUILD criteria on disease progression and therapy modifications
- Date Crossref
- 27/09/2025
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.