Linking mucus plugs and chronic bronchitis to bronchodilator responsiveness in young adult smokers: BEACON cohort
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: In COPD and asthma, mucus plugging is common but poorly corresponds to symptoms. To investigate if plugging and chronic bronchitis reflect different mucus dysfunction phenotypes, we assessed how their presence/absence related to airway hyper-responsiveness in young adult smokers. METHODS: The British Early COPD Network (BEACON) enrolled 30–45-year-old smokers with ≥10 pack year smoking history and FEV1%predicted≥80% without diagnosed/treated asthma. We compared FEV1 bronchodilator reversibility and blood eosinophil count according to the presence/absence of both chronic bronchitis (clinical, CAT, MRC and SGRQ definitions) and mucus plugs (full inspiratory CT thorax scan). RESULTS: Among 404 BEACON subjects (60% male; 82% Caucasian; median age 39 (IQR:35-42) years; median pack years 16 (IQR:12-21); FEV1% 100% (IQR:93-109)), 192(48%) reported chronic bronchitis (any definition), 38(9%) had mucus plugs. Those with plugs had greater FEV1 reversibility: 185(IQR:85-253) vs 130(IQR:50-220)mL(P=0.04) and more frequently had bronchodilator responsiveness than those without (P=0.03). We found no difference by chronic bronchitis presence and no differences in eosinophil counts (Fig.1). CONCLUSION: FEV1 reversibility was over-represented among those with mucus plugs, but not among those with chronic bronchitis, potentially indicating different pathological processes present among young adult smokers. erj;66/suppl_69/OA6435/F1 F1 F1
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Linking mucus plugs and chronic bronchitis to bronchodilator responsiveness in young adult smokers: BEACON cohort
- Date Crossref
- 27/09/2025
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.