Tozorakimab exerts distinct dual pharmacology to reduce COPD epithelial remodelling
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: COPD patients exhibit epithelial remodelling characterized by goblet cell hyperplasia and excessive mucus accumulation. Tozorakimab, an anti-IL-33 mAb which has shown efficacy in COPD, inhibits both IL-33red and IL-33ox activity through ST2 and RAGE/EGFR signalling pathways, respectively. Objective: To understand the extent to which signalling pathways with suggested clinical benefit in COPD have an impact on epithelial remodelling and wound healing. Methods: Anti-IL-33/ST2 mAbs were evaluated for their ability to reduce COPD epithelial remodelling in vitro. In addition, effects of anti-IL-4R and anti-TSLP on MUC5AC expression were determined. Results: Tozorakimab was the only anti-IL-33/ST2 mAb, including itepekimab and astegolimab, that reduced mucus secretion in differentiated, bronchial COPD ALI cultures (Table). mAbs targeting IL-4R and TSLP signalling did not alter MUC5AC expression. An IL-33ox/RAGE/EGFR-dependent epithelial scratch wound assay was used to compare pharmacology between mAbs, with only tozorakimab showing the ability to promote repair (Table). Epitope competition assays revealed a distinct binding epitope for tozorakimab binding to IL-33red versus other anti-IL-33 mAbs. Conclusion: Of the anti-IL-33/ST2 mAbs tested, only tozorakimab demonstrated the ability to reduce epithelial remodelling and promote repair. Tozorakimab is under clinical investigation in COPD and other respiratory diseases. erj;66/suppl_69/OA6527/F1 F1 F1
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Tozorakimab exerts distinct dual pharmacology to reduce COPD epithelial remodelling
- Date Crossref
- 27/09/2025
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.