Erratum: Refining Galactic primordial black hole evaporation constraints [Phys. Rev. D 110 , 123022 (2024)]
Le résumé fourni par la source
We correct the results obtained using the diffuse x-ray emission from Xmm-Newton, in light of new results from Ref. [1], that demonstrated that the dataset employed was misevaluated.We also update our calculation of the 511 keVemission from evaporating PBHs, which leads to slightly more conservative constraints as well.Reference [1], alongside with private communication with the authors of Ref. [2], suggest that recent bounds derived using Xmm-Newton data need to be revised.This arises from a misinterpretation regarding the solid angle of the observations with respect to the geometrical factor of a given ROI (which are 30 cocentric rings centered on the Galactic Center), this has also affected other recent dark matter (DM) indirect searches.In Ref. [2], they provide data that are normalized by the exposure-weighted average solid angle, which is orders of magnitude smaller than the geometric one.Taking for example Ring 3 (12°-18°), which was relevant to our work, the exposure-weighted average solid angle is 3.463 × 10 -5 sr, while the geometric angle is 0.156 sr, which is more than 4 orders of magnitude higher.FIG. 1.Comparison of the predicted DM-induced x-ray emission with diffuse x-ray data from Xmm-Newton in a region close to the Galactic Center.We show the prediction is shown for different values of M PBH when the PBH mass distribution is monochromatic (upper left panel), of a ⋆ (upper right panel) and σ when the distribution is log-normal (lower panel).
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Erratum: Refining Galactic primordial black hole evaporation constraints [Phys. Rev. D <b>110</b> , 123022 (2024)]
- Date Crossref
- 25/11/2025
- Éditeur
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.