Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Comparing the spatial effects and longevity of key fuel treatments in California using spaceborne lidar data

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, hu. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Systematically comparing fuel treatment strategies' effects on vegetation and fuel structure is essential for mitigating wildfire risk, supporting forest management, and reducing climate-related impacts. While prescribed fire and mechanical activities have been compared using field data, large-scale comparisons across treatment types have been limited by inconsistent vegetation structure measurements. To address this gap, we integrate total of 29 million observations from NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) spaceborne lidar mission with 2870 records from two fuel treatment datasets for California. We assessed spatial and temporal effects of fuel treatments in California forests. We compared broadcast burns, mechanical fuel reduction, fuel breaks, right-of-way clearance, and forest stewardship to untreated zones using GEDI-derived metrics: aboveground biomass density (AGBD), canopy cover, ladder fuels, canopy height, and layering. Broadcast burns produced significant reductions across all metrics, with the largest decrease in AGBD and canopy height (13–18 %). Mechanical fuel reduction significantly reduced all metrics except canopy height, though with smaller magnitude (6–16%). Fuel breaks yielded the greatest reductions in canopy cover, layering, and ladder fuels (19–26 %) but showed limited effects on canopy height and no significant reduction in AGBD. Using a space-for-time substitution analysis, we found mechanical treatments maintain reductions for 9–15 years across crown fuel metrics, lasting 6–9 years longer than prescribed fire. Managed wildfires showed heterogeneous recovery, while forest stewardship exhibited gradual regrowth. These findings underscore the value of GEDI and future active remote sensing missions for monitoring fuel treatment outcomes. Understanding ecological responses to treatments supports optimizing forest management to reduce wildfire risk in fire-prone regions. • Broadcast burns significantly reduce all canopy and fuel structural metrics. • Mechanical treatments achieve longer fuel reduction, lasting about 9–15 years. • Forest stewardship reduces fuel structure short-term but shows recovery over time. • Fuel breaks substantially reduce canopy structure despite narrow implementation areas. • GEDI lidar and space-for-time methods quantify spatial and temporal reduction effects.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comparing the spatial effects and longevity of key fuel treatments in California using spaceborne lidar data
Date Crossref
01/12/2025
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Fire effects on ecosystemsRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsRemote Sensing in Agriculture

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.