GII.17 norovirus re-emerged in the 2020s as a result of dynamic and adaptive evolutionary processes
Rattachement africain : us, de, es, ar. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Over the past two years, increased norovirus activity has been reported in multiple countries, accompanied by a rise in genotype GII.17 prevalence. Despite causing large outbreaks in Asia during 2014-2016, GII.17 has not historically been considered a predominant genotype. In this study, using 1471 archival and newly-identified GII.17 genomes, we investigated (i) global diversification patterns of this virus at the whole-genome level, (ii) in-depth mutational patterns within 511 viruses detected during a 10-year national survey in Germany, and (iii) intra-host viral diversity and adaptation processes that lead to the predominance of the GII.17 virus. The recent GII.17 norovirus exhibited extensive genetic diversity and multiple back-and-forth and recurrent mutations during the early phase of its epidemic; however, this diversity declined by 2024, suggesting that the virus had reached a phenotype efficient for human infection. Experimental data confirmed that mutations in the viral capsid enhanced binding to host factors associated with virus entry and resulted in antigenic changes compared to previously circulating clusters. Overall, this study demonstrated that the recent surge of GII.17 resulted from a dynamic, multifaceted process involving diverse adaptive strategies, ultimately enabling the virus to achieve sustained transmission within the human population.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- GII.17 norovirus re-emerged in the 2020s as a result of dynamic and adaptive evolutionary processes
- Date Crossref
- 24/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.