Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Comparison of Echocardiography and Invasive Transseptal Catheterization for Assessing Transvalvular Gradient in Patients with Surgical Aortic Valve Prostheses: Fact or Myth?

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : tr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Echocardiography is the primary assessment tool for follow-up in patients with aortic valve prostheses. However, there are concerns regarding the consistency between echocardiographic and invasive transvalvular gradients (TVGs). This study utilized both noninvasive and invasive methods to compare the TVGs in aortic valve prostheses. Methods: The study included fourteen patients who had previously undergone surgical aortic valve replacement [metallic (n = 12) and bioprosthetic (n = 2)]. All patients had moderate-to-severe TVGs, which were measured during follow-up echocardiography, and they underwent invasive transseptal catheterization. Invasive and echocardiographic TVGs were measured and compared. Results: The median interval between index valvular surgery and invasive TVG measurement was 6.7 (2.5–11.5) years. The median interval between echocardiographic and invasive TVG measurements was 7.2 (2–19) days. Only 12 (85.7%) patients were symptomatic during echocardiographic assessment. Maximum TVGs obtained by echocardiography were higher than invasive peak-to-peak TVGs (77.0 ± 13.1 vs. 47.5 ± 21.7 mmHg, p < 0.05). There was a significant negative correlation between the echocardiography-based aortic valve area and the effective orifice area index with the catheter-based peak-to-peak aortic gradient (r = −0.64, p = 0.014 and r = −0.63, p = 0.015). Six patients (42.9%) who revealed severe catheter-based peak-to-peak aortic gradient underwent redo aortic valve surgeries. The cut-off value of EOAI of <0.50 cm2/m2 was found to be a predictor of severe catheter-based peak-to-peak aortic gradient. Conclusions: In our preliminary cohort study, the TVGs of aortic valvular prostheses measured by echocardiography were significantly greater than those measured by invasive transseptal catheterization. During follow-up, invasive confirmation of echocardiographic moderate-to-severe TVGs in selected patients with surgical aortic valvular prostheses may be considered.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comparison of Echocardiography and Invasive Transseptal Catheterization for Assessing Transvalvular Gradient in Patients with Surgical Aortic Valve Prostheses: Fact or Myth?
Date Crossref
24/11/2025
Éditeur
MDPI AG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsCongenital Heart Disease StudiesAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.