Stage 1 type 1 diabetes memory B lymphocytes transcriptionally differ from healthy controls and harbor insulin-binding specificities
Rattachement africain : us, au, fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Autoreactive B cell activity defines the earliest detectable stage (Stage 1) of type 1 diabetes (T1D) but is incompletely understood, particularly for B cells reactive against the key T1D autoantigen, insulin. To test whether Stage 1 T1D B cells are transcriptionally rewired compared to healthy individuals, we performed single-cell transcriptional, phenotypic, and immune repertoire profiling of CD19+ cells isolated from the peripheral blood of Stage 1 T1D individuals, identified via Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet as being positive for ≥ 2/5 islet autoantibodies, and healthy controls. Stage 1 T1D memory B cells upregulated n = 122 genes compared to healthy controls, including genes involved in actin cytoskeleton rearrangement, B cell receptor (BCR) signaling, and antigen presentation, and exhibited reduced BCR somatic hypermutation, particularly in atypical-like memory B cells. Clonally expanded B cells in the atypical-like memory subset of Stage 1 T1D individuals exhibited avidity driven insulin-binding specificities, without polyreactivity to HEp-2 cell autoantigens. Insulin-binding B cells showed non-significant upregulation of genes involved in key B cell functions. Our findings highlight transcriptional and BCR-repertoire differences in Stage 1 T1D B cells with potential for optimization as future screening tools to identify rare, autoreactive B cells and biomarkers of T1D progression.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Stage 1 type 1 diabetes memory B lymphocytes transcriptionally differ from healthy controls and harbor insulin-binding specificities
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.