Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Potential impact of [18F]-FACBC PET in radiotherapy target definition of glioma

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : no. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare [18F]-FACBC positron emission tomography (PET)-based radiotherapy (RT) volumes to magnetic resonance (MR)-based volumes and investigate the potential impact of including [18F]-FACBC PET in RT treatment planning for gliomas. METHODS: MR- and PET-defined gross tumor volumes (GTVs) were independently contoured on pre-operative [18F]-FACBC PET/MR images in 24 patients with primary or recurrent low- or high-grade glioma. MR GTVs were defined from regions of contrast-enhancement on T1-weighted (ce-T1) sequences. For non-enhancing tumors or non-enhancing tumor components, regions of FLAIR hyperintensity were also included. PET-based GTVs were delineated using a tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) threshold of 2. GTVs were expanded by an isotropic margin to form clinical target volumes (CTVs). Volumetric analysis was performed using size comparisons, Dice coefficients (DC), overlap coefficients (OC) and Hausdorff distances (HD). RESULTS: PET GTVs were overall significantly smaller than MR GTVs, with median values of 14.8 ccm (6.5–26.7 ccm) and 28.5 ccm (17.2–62.7 ccm), respectively (p = 0.011). No significant volume difference was found between PET and MR volumes when MR volumes were based on ce-T1 only, but PET-based GTVs and CTVs were significantly smaller than MR-based GTVs and CTVs when the latter included FLAIR hyperintensity (p < 0.01). Similarity metrics showed a high degree of concordance between PET and MR volumes in cases where MR volumes were based on ce-T1 only, particularly for CTVs (DC: 0.88 (0.82–0.94), OC: 0.98 (0.96–0.99), HD: 0.86 cm (0.7–1.4 cm)). In comparison, for cases including FLAIR hyperintensity, MR CTVs had a high overlap with PET CTVs (OC: 0.99 (0.96–0.99)), but otherwise significantly lower degree of concordance (DC: 0.66 (0.46–0.81), p < 0.01, HD: 2.65 cm (2.22–3.85 cm), p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: [18F]-FACBC PET underestimates tumor extension compared to FLAIR in contrast negative tumors and tumors containing non-enhancing components, indicating reduced sensitivity to low-grade tumor tissue and microscopic tumor infiltration. Inclusion of [18F]-FACBC PET as supplement to MR in RT planning for glioma could however help identify regions of highly malignant tumor, to facilitate target volume reduction and dose escalation strategies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Potential impact of [18F]-FACBC PET in radiotherapy target definition of glioma
Date Crossref
21/11/2025
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.