Reconciling top-down conservation priorities with bottom-up local needs
Résumé fourni par la source
The success of global conservation goals risks being undermined by conflicts that arise when high-level, data-driven priorities clash with local needs and contexts. While top-down systematic planning efficiently identifies priority areas using large-scale, multi-dimensional data, it neglects the input of local communities and stakeholders. Here, we propose a novel priority-setting process that integrates these potentially divergent perspectives using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). Our framework uses an iterative, interactive AI-driven approach to optimize conservation policies by combining initial data-driven proposals with local knowledge and values provided as human feedback. This feedback is converted into a dynamic reward structure, allowing the model to learn and incorporate granular preferences and constraints. Before real deployment, we propose an intermediate calibration step where Large Language Models simulate structured stakeholder feedback to optimize the integration pipeline. Our RLHF approach provides a flexible and powerful roadmap for allocating conservation resources holistically, effectively, and inclusively, thereby increasing the probability of achieving long-lasting biodiversity and societal improvements.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Reconciling top-down conservation priorities with bottom-up local needs
- Date Crossref
- 21/11/2025
- Éditeur
- California Digital Library (CDL)
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.