GAN-CSA: Enhanced Generative Adversarial Networks for Accurate Detection and Surgical Guidance in Skull Base Brain Metastases
Rattachement africain : in, sa. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Skull-base brain metastases pose significant diagnostic and surgical challenges due to their proximity to vital neurological structures. We propose an enhanced Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) model optimised with the Crow Search Algorithm (CSA) to improve detection accuracy and intraoperative decision-making. The GAN framework facilitates high-fidelity image generation and segmentation, while CSA fine-tunes hyperparameters for improved model stability and accuracy. Trained on high-resolution brain MRI datasets with expert annotations, our model achieved a precision of 97.43%, surpassing existing approaches in accuracy and robustness. The system accurately delineates tumour margins and adjacent anatomical structures in real-time, enhancing surgical guidance and reducing operative risks. The inclusion of CSA significantly improved GAN convergence and reduced false positives. This integrated GAN-CSA approach shows promise for revolutionizing neuro-oncology practices by enabling safer and more precise skull base surgeries. As an initial proof-of-concept, the evaluation was limited to 156 MR volumes from a single scanner, and future cross-centre studies will be pursued to establish robustness across varying field strengths, coils, and imaging protocols.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- GAN-CSA: Enhanced Generative Adversarial Networks for Accurate Detection and Surgical Guidance in Skull Base Brain Metastases
- Date Crossref
- 21/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.