Thermally programmed one-pot CRISPR assay for on-site pandemic surveillance
Rattachement africain : us, cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The ongoing monkeypox virus outbreak highlights the need for rapid and accurate diagnostics to enhance epidemic control. CRISPR-based assays hold promise, but clinical translation is hindered by high complexity and low throughput. Here, we describe a thermally regulated asynchronous CRISPR-enhanced (TRACE) assay that rapidly and sensitively detects multiple DNA targets in a streamlined, one-pot format. TRACE exhibits a 2.5 copies/test limit of detection – 40 times lower than a canonical one-pot CRISPR. When applied to clinical samples, it achieves 99.5% accuracy across diverse sample types, and can detect MPXV within 11 minutes. Point-of-care TRACE assays meet ASSURED criteria and deliver comparable performance to qPCR, with a fivefold reduced report time, in outpatient settings. Moreover, TRACE enables simultaneous detection of pathogen and host genes at comparable sensitivity to address a critical limitation of current CRISPR assays, which lack internal controls. TRACE thus enables rapid, on-site surveillance to facilitate bench-to-bedside translation of CRISPR diagnostics. The clinical adaptation of CRISPR assays is constrained by complexity and the absence of quality control. Here, authors report a thermally regulated asynchronous CRISPR-enhanced assay enabling direct, highly sensitive one-step detection of monkeypox virus and a human gene in clinical samples.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Thermally programmed one-pot CRISPR assay for on-site pandemic surveillance
- Date Crossref
- 21/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.