TopEros: An Integrated Hydrology and Multi-Process Erosion Model—A Comparison with MUSLE
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Hydro-erosion is a primary driver of soil degradation worldwide, yet accurate catchment-scale prediction remains challenging because sheet, gully, and raindrop-impact detachment processes operate simultaneously at sub-grid scales. We introduce TopEros, a hydro-erosion model that integrates the hydrological framework of TOPMODEL with three distinct erosion modules: sheet erosion, gully erosion, and raindrop-impact detachment. TopEros employs a sub-grid zoning strategy in which each grid cell is partitioned into diffuse-flow (sheet erosion) and concentrated-flow (gully erosion) domains using threshold values of two topographic indices: the topographic index (TI) and the contributing area–slope index (aitanβ). Applied to the Namatala River catchment in eastern Uganda and calibrated with TI = 15 and aitanβ = 35, TopEros identified sheet-dominated and gully-prone areas. The simulated specific sediment yields ranged from 95 to 155 Mgha−1yr−1—classified as “high” to “very high”—with gully zones contributing disproportionately large erosion volumes. These results demonstrate the importance of capturing intra-cell heterogeneity: conventional catchment-average approaches can obscure critical erosion hotspots. By explicitly representing multiple soil detachment and transport mechanisms within a unified process-based framework, TopEros has the potential to enhance the realism of catchment-scale erosion estimates and support the precise targeting of soil and water conservation measures.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- TopEros: An Integrated Hydrology and Multi-Process Erosion Model—A Comparison with MUSLE
- Date Crossref
- 20/11/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.