Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Heterogeneity of Estimated GFR Slopes According to Etiology, Estimated GFR and Urinary Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio in a Large Cohort of Patients With CKD

1Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
9Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Introduction The rate of decline in eGFR is increasingly recognized as a quantitative marker of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. However, data on eGFR slopes have mainly been reported in cohorts enriched for fast progression and the heterogeneity of eGFR slopes across the spectrum of CKD remains poorly defined. Methods In 5,214 participants of the German CKD (GCKD) study, we modeled eGFR slopes using per-protocol and clinical measurements. We used linear-mixed effects models, with eGFR slope as the outcome and baseline demographics as independent variables, to (i) describe eGFR slope heterogeneity, (ii) assess differences by CKD etiology, eGFR and UACR categories, sex and age, and (iii) determine associations of slopes with estimated eGFR decline (30%, 40%, and 57%) and observed endpoints (kidney failure with replacement therapy, mortality). Results On average 9 eGFR values/participant (IQR 7-12) over 6.5 years were used for slope calculation. The adjusted mean annual eGFR slope was -1.43mL/min/1.73m 2 . Slopes were similar across eGFR categories, but steeper with higher UACR. Faster eGFR decline was observed in participants of younger age and in those with polycystic or diabetic kidney disease. While eGFR slopes did not consistently differ by sex, women with diabetes as the leading cause of CKD had lower slopes than their male counterparts. A rapid annual decline (> 5 mL/min/1.73m 2 ) occurred in 4.3%, with variation in frequency by CKD cause and UACR. Conclusion In conclusion, while the average eGFR slope was low, it varied considerably, depending on CKD etiology and UACR. This data may help to put slope estimates in individual patients and defined subpopulations into perspective.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Heterogeneity of Estimated GFR Slopes According to Etiology, Estimated GFR and Urinary Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio in a Large Cohort of Patients With CKD
Date Crossref
01/02/2026
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesDiabetes Treatment and Management

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.