Rapid targeted analysis of the genome: Rapid genomic sequencing in critically ill infants
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Purpose: We developed a genome sequencing-based test (Rapid Targeted Analysis of the Genome for Infants [rTAG-I]) to minimize turnaround time while maximizing diagnostic yield and access to rapid sequencing for critically ill infants. We sought to create a system of predicting which infants would have a molecular finding. Methods: We performed a prospective observational study of infants referred for genetics consult who received rTAG-I testing, which analyzes 3183 curated genes with phenotype-agnostic prioritization of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants. Infants were stratified by perceived likelihood of a diagnostic result and divided into "Likely," "Uncertain," and "Not Likely." We also assessed whether reportable findings correlated with patient phenotypes. Results: We identified reportable findings in 133/400 (33%) infants. Access to rapid testing increased from 1% to 20% of all infants hospitalized in the neonatal/infant intensive care unit and cardiac intensive care unit, with a median turnaround time of 4.9 days. rTAG-I performed as well as exome/genome sequencing. Clinically associated results were identified in 59% of the "Likely" group and 9% of the "Not Likely" group. Conclusion: rTAG-I produced a high rate of reportable findings with a rapid turnaround time. Our ability to predict infants who would benefit most was imperfect, reinforcing that broad access to genome-based testing is still required.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Rapid targeted analysis of the genome: Rapid genomic sequencing in critically ill infants
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.