Engaging longitudinal cohort participants in a research priority setting process for the Raine Study
Rattachement africain : au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The Raine Study, one of the world’s longest-running multigenerational cohort studies, has consistently engaged participants in shaping specific research projects within the Raine Study. While participant involvement has been integral to study operations, there has not previously been an opportunity for participants to actively help shape the overall research agenda. The Participant Priority Setting Project (the Project) was developed to address this gap, providing a structured process to establish participant-led research priorities that will guide future study directions. The Project utilised a modified version of the James Lind Alliance (JLA) Priority Setting Partnerships (PSP) Framework to engage Generation 1 (Gen1) and Generation 2 (Gen2) participants in a structured prioritisation process. An online survey was distributed to all active Gen1 and Gen2 participants with an email address on file, to elicit their input on research topics of interest. Responses were analysed and grouped into themes to facilitate discussion. A consensus workshop was then conducted, bringing participants together to refine and rank these themes, ultimately identifying the Top 10 research priorities for the Raine Study. The survey received a total of 535 responses (15.11% response rate), presenting 1,225 unique topics. These topics were consolidated into 44 overarching themes, further refined to a final set of 23 themes to take to the consensus workshop. The consensus workshop facilitated participant-driven decision-making amongst its 23 attendees, resulting in a final list of Top 10 research priorities: Mental Health, Health Education and Intervention, Reproductive Health, Cognitive Behaviour, Generational Impact, Neurodivergence, Sex-Specific Health, Environmental Health, Gastrointestinal Health, and the Socioeconomic Effects on Health. In addition to establishing specific priorities, the process highlighted additional themes warranting future exploration. The project demonstrated the feasibility and importance of incorporating participant input into research agenda setting, reinforcing the value of participant involvement at the Raine Study. By integrating participant-informed priorities, the Raine Study strengthens its commitment to meaningful, participant-driven research that reflects the interests and concerns of its cohort. The outcomes of this project will guide future research planning, ensuring alignment with participant-identified priorities. The Raine Study is a long-running study looking at the health and well-being of a group of Western Australian families for over 35 years. Participants are at the heart of the study, shaping its research direction and communication. While participants have previously contributed to research grant development, they had not been directly involved in setting the Raine Study’s overall research agenda. To address this, the Participant Priority Setting Project was designed to give participants a voice in shaping future research priorities. Using a structured process, from a modified James Lind Alliance (JLA) Priority Setting Partnerships (PSP) Framework, we invited Generation 1 (Gen1) and Generation 2 (Gen2) participants to share the topics most important to them through an online survey. Their responses were analysed and grouped into key themes, forming the foundation for further discussions. Following this, a consensus workshop brought participants together to review and refine these themes, collaboratively identifying the Top 10 research priorities: Mental Health, Health Education and Intervention, Reproductive Health, Cognitive Behaviour, Generational Impact, Neurodivergence, Sex-Specific Health, Environmental Health, Gastrointestinal Health, and the Socioeconomic Effects on Health. These priorities will shape the direction of future research within the Raine Study, ensuring it reflects the needs and interests of participants. Additionally, the process highlighted other meaningful themes that merit further exploration. This project demonstrates a commitment to participant engagement, ensuring participants play an active role in shaping the direction of Raine Study research. Through collaboration, a clear set of priorities has been established to help inform future studies and strengthen the impact of participant-driven research.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Engaging longitudinal cohort participants in a research priority setting process for the Raine Study
- Date Crossref
- 20/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.