Loggers affect the foraging behaviour and fitness of European shags

Le résumé fourni par la source

Biologgers enable real‐time collection of detailed behavioural and physiological data from wide‐ranging animals, including seabirds inhabiting remote regions. However, the number of studies using tracking devices has not been matched by research exploring the behavioural and fitness costs of deployment, and the effects on data reliability. We assessed how GPS loggers, video loggers, and time depth recorders (TDRs) affect the behaviour, physiology, and reproductive performance of European shags Gulosus aristotelis breeding on Sklinna, Norway. The loggers varied in mass, attachment location and deployment duration, allowing comparison of their relative effects. Birds without loggers served as controls to assess logger‐related changes in adult body mass, chick growth, reproductive success, and survival. Birds with longer‐term tail‐mounted GPS loggers and leg‐mounted TDRs showed altered foraging behaviour, including shorter trips and dives, compared to birds with tail‐mounted GPS and TDRs of the same weight, instrumented for only two days. A mean loss in body mass was experienced by adult birds regardless of the logger type used, while chick growth rate dropped to 20% of that observed in control nests when video, TDR and GPS loggers (~ 4% of body mass) were deployed together. Logger attachments did not impact reproductive success, and overall logger birds showed higher survival than controls. However, female survival was lower than that of males among birds fitted with video and long‐term GPS loggers. Our results demonstrate the importance of measuring behavioural and physiological effects that can scale over time. The advances in our understanding of animal ecology and behaviour generated by biologging have been impressive, but there is a need to consider the impacts on animal welfare and data quality. Consistent reporting of logger deployment details is essential to assess biologging impacts across species and refine protocols that account for device weight, drag and attachment location.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.