Captive dolphins face higher levels of microplastic pollution than wild individuals
Rattachement africain : cn, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Traditional research on microplastics in cetaceans has largely overlooked the extraction methods and their occurrence in multi-tissues. Here we present a reliable framework for extracting microplastics from multi-tissues of cetaceans, achieved through methodological comparisons and stringent quality control measures. Furthermore, a case study assesses microplastics in wild and captive pantropical spotted dolphins (Stenella attenuata). The high microplastic detection rates (80% − 100%) across various tissues underscore the contribution of microplastics from atmospheric, aquatic, and dietary sources to cetacean exposure. The microplastic abundance and detection rate in S. attenuata show a logistic relationship, indicating extensive pollution. Wild individuals exhibited more diverse microplastics (0.67 ± 0.12) than their captive counterparts (0.59 ± 0.09). Conversely, captive individuals highlighted higher pollution levels (0.67 ± 0.47 items g−1) than wild individuals (0.19 ± 0.08 items g−1). These findings provide valuable baseline data and perspectives for studying microplastic pollution and informing management strategies for marine mammals. Dolphins in captivity are exposed to higher levels of microplastics with lower diversity than wild dolphins, according to analyses based on a framework for sampling microplastics from cetacean tissues.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Captive dolphins face higher levels of microplastic pollution than wild individuals
- Date Crossref
- 18/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.