Evolution and reform of Medical Microbiology education in New Medical Science era
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Objectives Medical Microbiology is a cornerstone of medical education. Under the guidance of the “New Medical Science” concept, curriculum reform is imperative. This study aims to identify learning gaps, design innovative teaching strategies, and conduct rigorous evaluation of the reform effectiveness. Methods This study analyzed challenges in student courses and proposed innovations: updating course objectives; reconstructing content to integrate scientific thinking, One Health concepts, and infectious disease prevention; adopting a blended approach that combines lectures with discussions, foundational knowledge with cutting-edge research, and online with offline materials; and implementing a developmental, diversified evaluation system. Results The reforms proved highly effective. Students showed marked academic improvement, particularly in knowledge application, as well as enhanced critical and systematic thinking skills. Furthermore, their interest and ability in research grew, and they gained a deeper understanding of the key role of microbiological literacy in preventing and managing infectious diseases in clinical settings. Conclusions This innovative Medical Microbiology curriculum reform, guided by the “New Medical Science” paradigm, adopted a student-centered approach through content and pedagogical innovation. The success of this approach provides a valuable framework for transforming foundational medical education.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evolution and reform of Medical Microbiology education in New Medical Science era
- Date Crossref
- 19/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.