Differentiation Between Moderate Versus High Myopia: The 2-Continent Eye Study
Résumé fourni par la source
Objective: To determine the cutoff value in axial length between moderate myopia versus high myopia in dependence on the prevalence of myopic macular degeneration (MMD). Design: Population-based studies conducted in Russia, China, and India. Participants: The project included the population-based investigations of the Beijing Eye Study (n = 3325; age: 40+ years), Russian Ural Eye and Medical Study (n = 5586 participants; age: 40+ years), Ural Very Old Study (n = 541; age: 85+ years) and Ural Children Eye Study (n = 4255; age: 6+ years), and Central India Eye and Medical Study (n = 4467; age: 30+ years). Methods: The participants underwent a series of general medical and ophthalmic examinations, including fundus photography and ocular biometry. Myopic macular degeneration was defined according to the Meta-analysis for Pathologic Myopia Study Group. Main Outcome Measures: Prevalence of MMD in dependence on axial length. Results: = 0.02, respectively). The turning points of the regression curves of the associations of axial length with prevalence of MMD stage 2+ and 3+ were located at axial length values of between 26.0 and 26.5 mm, respectively. Conclusions: The axial length-related cutoff for moderate versus high myopia was located approximately at 26.0 and 26.5 mm for the prevalence of MMD stage 2+ and 3+, respectively, with higher values for younger individuals. Myopic macular degeneration prevalence was higher in the Indian cohort. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Differentiation Between Moderate Versus High Myopia: The 2-Continent Eye Study
- Date Crossref
- 01/02/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.