Applying Genetic Risk Score to Improve Risk Assessment of New‐Onset Lupus Nephritis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Large‐Scale Prospective Cohort Study
Résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, reliable tools for predicting LN risk remain limited. In this multicenter prospective cohort study, we developed, validated, and refined a risk stratification model for new‐onset LN. A total of 2441 SLE patients without baseline renal involvement were consecutively enrolled from the Chinese SLE Treatment and Research (CSTAR) registry, with 215 (8.8%) developed LN in a median follow‐up time of 3.5 years. A combination of clinical predictors, age < 30 years, absence of arthritis, serositis, hypocomplementemia, and positive anti‐double‐stranded DNA antibodies identified a clinical high‐risk group ( n = 537, 22.0%) with a 3‐year LN incidence of 18.1%. The model was externally validated in 451 patients, with 50 developed LN in a median follow‐up time of 3.4 years. In these patients, a genetic risk score (GRS) derived from 112 SLE‐associated loci was found to be independently associated with LN (HR = 3.19, 95% CI, 1.83–5.55, p = 4.36 × 10 −5 ). Among clinically low‐risk individuals, those in the highest GRS quartiles (81/451, 18.0%) showed elevated 3‐year LN incidence (15.5% vs. 1.4%). New‐onset LN may be predicted using a combination of clinical risk factors, and integrating GRS further improves risk stratification, enabling early identification of high‐risk patients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Applying Genetic Risk Score to Improve Risk Assessment of New‐Onset Lupus Nephritis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Large‐Scale Prospective Cohort Study
- Date Crossref
- 14/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.