Diagnostic accuracy of the Cepheid MTB host response assay for the detection of pulmonary TB
Rattachement africain : us, pe, Afrique du Sud, Ouganda, vn, ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Current sputum-based diagnostic approaches fail to identify some individuals with active TB, underscoring the need for tests that do not rely on sputum. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB Host Response (Xpert HR) blood test for detecting pulmonary TB. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in adults with pulmonary TB symptoms who underwent Xpert HR testing. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed against a microbiological reference standard of sputum cultures and molecular testing. RESULTS: Among 813 participants, 52% were female, median age was 38 years, and 192 (24%) were HIV-positive. For Xpert HR performed using capillary blood, sensitivity was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86-94), specificity was 45% (95% CI: 41-49), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81-0.89). Country-specific differences in performance were observed. Sensitivity was 93% (95% CI: 76-98) and specificity was 18% (95% CI: 13-27) among people living with HIV. CONCLUSION: The Xpert HR TB assay demonstrated promising sensitivity, but its specificity did not meet minimum target product profiles for a TB triage or case detection test. In its current form, Xpert HR cannot replace more sensitive nucleic acid amplification tests in sputum-productive individuals.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Diagnostic accuracy of the Cepheid MTB host response assay for the detection of pulmonary TB
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2025
- Éditeur
- International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.