Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Induction of labor for suspected fetal macrosomia: An updated meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials and trial sequential analysis

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : Égypte. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Fetal macrosomia is linked with increased risks of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, such as shoulder dystocia, cesarean delivery, and birth trauma. The optimal management strategy for non-diabetic pregnancies with suspected macrosomia remains uncertain, with conflicting evidence from previous trials. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of labor induction on maternal and neonatal outcomes in this population. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched electronic databases up to June 2025 to identify randomized clinical trials comparing induction of labor with expectant management for suspected fetal macrosomia in non-diabetic pregnant women. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included the studies that met the PICOs criteria. Women with pre-gestational or treated gestational diabetes mellitus were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Continuous outcomes were summarized as mean differences (MD) and dichotomous outcomes as risk ratios (RR), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI), using a random-effects model. Analyses were performed using R version 4.3. The primary outcomes were shoulder dystocia and cesarean delivery. MAIN RESULTS: Four studies with 4024 women were included. Induction of labor significantly reduced the risk of shoulder dystocia, cesarean delivery, and fetal fracture with a pooled RR of 0.68 (95% CI 0.49-0.95), 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.95), and 0.28 (95% CI 0.09-0.95), respectively, compared with expectant management. However, induction of labor was associated with increased risk of hyperbilirubinemia and phototherapy with a pooled RR of 3.03 (95% CI 1.60-5.74) and 1.63 (95% CI 1.17-2.26), respectively. No significant differences were observed in brachial plexus injuries, intracranial hemorrhages, perinatal deaths, operative vaginal delivery, or perineal tear, between the two groups. CONCLUSION: weeks of pregnancy) significantly reduced the risks of shoulder dystocia, fetal fractures, and cesarean delivery rates, with an increase in spontaneous vaginal delivery. These findings support reconsideration of current management guidelines and highlight the potential benefits of timely labor induction.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Induction of labor for suspected fetal macrosomia: An updated meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials and trial sequential analysis
Date Crossref
14/11/2025
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsPregnancy-related medical research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.