Efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors combined with anti-angiogenic agents in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: PD-1 inhibitors have shown significant progress in treating recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC); however, the optimal second-line regimen remains unclear. Studies have suggested that the combination of PD-1 inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents shows synergistic potential in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an extensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to May 13, 2025. Stata 18.0 was used to analyze the eligible data. RESULTS: Eight clinical trials involving 271 cases were included. The objective response rate (ORR) was 49% (95% CI: 39-59%), the disease control rate (DCR) was 80% (95% CI: 74-85%), the one-year progression-free survival rate (1-year PFS) was 39% (95% CI: 29-49%), and the one-year overall survival rate (1-year OS) was 73% (95% CI: 58-85%). The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was hypothyroidism, occurring in 36% of patients. Additionally, further subgroup analysis showed that combination therapy was more effective in patients who had not previously received PD-1 inhibitors (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: In summary, PD-1 inhibitors combined with anti-angiogenic agents exhibited notable effectiveness with a manageable safety profile. Additional phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to confirm these findings.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors combined with anti-angiogenic agents in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Date Crossref
- 10/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.