Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Efficacy and Safety of Roflumilast versus Alpha-Lipoic Acid in Type 2 Diabetes with Neuropathy: A Comparative Clinical Study

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : Égypte. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Aim: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of roflumilast compared to alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) in type 2 diabetic patients with diabetic neuropathy. Methods: In this randomized controlled parallel study, 58 type 2 diabetic patients with diabetic neuropathy were randomly allocated into (Roflumilast group; n=29), which received 500 mcg/day of oral roflumilast and (ALA group; n=29), which received 600 mg/day of oral ALA. At baseline and 12 weeks after intervention, blood samples were collected to assess fasting blood glucose (FBG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C), insulin, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), malondialdehyde (MDA), and neurotensin (NT) levels. Homeostatic Model Assessment of Beta Cell Function (HOMA-1β) and Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) were calculated. Neuropathic symptoms and neuropathic pain were assessed using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Questionnaire (MNSIQ), the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Examination (MNSIE), and the Douleur Neuropathique-4 (DN4) questionnaire. Results: After intervention and as compared to baseline, both groups showed significant decreases in HbA1C, FBG, fasting insulin level, HOMA-IR, HOMA-1β, and serum levels of TNF-α, MDA, and neurotensin (P<0.001). The comparison between the two study groups post-treatment indicated that the roflumilast group showed a significant decrease in HbA1C by 0.7% (8.8% relative reduction) compared to 0.3% (3.8% relative reduction) in the ALA group (P<0.001), FBG (P<0.001), fasting insulin level (P=0.012), and HOMA-IR (P<0.001). Similarly, serum MDA level was declined by 0.80 nmol/mL (37.0% reduction) with the roflumilast group versus 0.56 nmol/mL (25.1% reduction) with the ALA group (P=0.003). Post-intervention and compared to baseline data, both groups exhibited significant reductions in neuropathy scores (P<0.001). The comparison between the two study groups after treatment revealed non-significant variations between both groups regarding MNSIQ, MNSIE, and DN4 scores (P>0.05). Conclusion: Roflumilast may offer superior glycemic and oxidative stress control benefits, though neuropathy symptoms control was comparable to ALA. Clinicaltrialsgov Id: (NCT05369793).

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Efficacy and Safety of Roflumilast versus Alpha-Lipoic Acid in Type 2 Diabetes with Neuropathy: A Comparative Clinical Study
Date Crossref
01/11/2025
Éditeur
Informa UK Limited
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Biochemical Acid Research StudiesNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.