Variation in global trauma care: a survey of 187 hospitals across 51 countries
Rattachement africain : gb, co, mx, République démocratique du Congo, in, Ghana, tr, it, cn, fr, us, Afrique du Sud. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Trauma is a heterogeneous disease entity, with high rates of mortality and morbidity observed globally. While the health systems in which trauma patients are cared for worldwide have been previously assessed to varying degrees, many of the system processes that shape trauma patient outcomes remain unknown. METHODS: We conducted a survey of 187 hospitals across 51 countries, through the GOAL-Trauma collaborative network. We explored prehospital, intrahospital and rehabilitation phases of trauma care. Data were compared across Human Development Index (HDI) tertiles, with thematic analyses performed to identify similarities and variation across settings. FINDINGS: Hospital-based care appeared to develop preferentially out of the three phases of trauma care, with challenges from the middle HDI tertile being more analogous to the upper HDI tertile than the lower HDI tertile. A lack of emergency medical services, limited patient finances and a lack of health literacy were common causes of prehospital delay in the lower and middle HDI tertiles. Surgeons and anaesthetists working in lower and middle HDI tertiles perform approximately 3-fold and 10-fold more operations, respectively, compared with upper HDI tertile counterparts. Across all HDI tertiles, infection was reported as the most common cause of postoperative morbidity. INTERPRETATION: A wide range of resources and processes exist globally in trauma care. Our findings suggest that with increasing resource availability, in-hospital care of trauma patients develops preferentially over prehospital or rehabilitation services. There is a clear need to coordinate available resources across all phases of care in order to improve outcomes among trauma patients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Variation in global trauma care: a survey of 187 hospitals across 51 countries
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2025
- Éditeur
- BMJ
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.