Estimating Cluster Masses: A Comparative Study between Machine Learning and Maximum Likelihood

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract We compare an autoencoder convolutional neural network (AE-CNN) with conventional maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE) for inferring cluster virial masses, M v , directly from the galaxy distribution around clusters, without identifying members or interlopers. The AE-CNN is trained on mock galaxy catalogues, whereas the MLE assumes that clusters of similar mass share the same phase-space galaxy profile. Conceptually, the MLE returns an unbiased estimate of log M v at fixed true mass, whereas the AE-CNN approximates the posterior mean, so the true log M v is unbiased at fixed estimate. Using MultiDark Planck 2 mock clusters with redshift space number density as input, the AE-CNN attains an rms scatter of 0.10 dex between predicted and true log M v , compared with 0.16 dex for the MLE. With inputs based on mean peculiar velocities, binned in redshift space or observed distance, the AE-CNN achieves scatters of 0.12 and 0.16 dex, respectively, despite strong inhomogeneous Malmquist bias.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.