Red Light Photodynamic Therapy with 10% Aminolevulinic Acid Gel Showed Robust Efficacy for the Treatment of Superficial BCC in a Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multicenter Phase III Study
Rattachement africain : us, jp, de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is often treated surgically; however, depending on lesion size, location, or patient preference, surgery may not be the best option. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has emerged as one alternative treatment for low-risk tumors like superficial BCC (sBCC). With this phase III study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of red light PDT with 10% 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) gel versus vehicle in participants with sBCC. Methods: This phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel group study (NCT03573401) was conducted at 21 U.S. centers. Eligible participants had at least one naïve, histologically confirmed sBCC on the face, scalp, neck/trunk and/or extremities. One lesion per participant was defined as the main target lesion (MTL) for mandatory final excision. Additional lesions were treated but not excised. Either 10% ALA gel (BF-200 ALA, Ameluz®) or vehicle was applied to the lesions and incubated under occlusion for 3 to 3.5 hours, followed by illumination with BF-RhodoLED® (10 min, 635 nm, 37 J/cm²). Treatment was administered in PDT cycles (2 PDT sessions per cycle) with a maximum of 2 PDT cycles per participant. Clinical and histological assessments were performed 12 weeks after start of the last PDT cycle. Results: Of the 187 randomized participants, 145 received 10% ALA gel and 42 received vehicle. Treatment with ALA gel resulted in significantly higher clearance rates compared with vehicle across all respective endpoints (p<0.0001 for all clearances). Clinical clearance of MTLs was achieved in 83.4% of patients in the ALA group versus 21.4% in the vehicle group. Histological clearance of MTLs was similarly superior with ALA gel (75.9% vs. 19.0%). Composite clearance of MTLs, defined as both clinical and histological clearance of MTLs, was observed in 65.5% of ALA-treated participants compared with only 4.8% in the vehicle group. Complete clinical clearance was achieved by 82.1% of participants treated with the ALA gel versus 21.4% of participants treated with vehicle. Combined clinical and histological clearance was achieved by 64.1% of participants in the ALA group versus 4.8% in vehicle. Overall clinical lesion clearance was also higher with ALA (82.6% vs. 21.6%). Esthetic outcomes were favorable in both groups but consistently better with ALA gel. Investigators rated 89.3% of ALA-treated lesions as having a very good or good cosmetic result, compared with 58.0% of vehicle-treated lesions. Participant-reported satisfaction was high regardless of treatment group, with 88.1% of lesions treated with ALA gel and 74.0% of vehicle-treated lesions rated as very good or good. No previously unknown adverse reaction occurred. Conclusion: PDT with 10% ALA gel demonstrated significantly higher clearance rates versus vehicle, with favorable safety and aesthetic outcomes. These results support red light PDT with 10% ALA gel as a highly suitable non-surgical option for sBCC, particularly for multiple or large lesions, in low-risk areas, when patients either decline surgery or are not a good candidate for surgery. The study was sponsored by Biofrontera Bioscience GmbH.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Red Light Photodynamic Therapy with 10% Aminolevulinic Acid Gel Showed Robust Efficacy for the Treatment of Superficial BCC in a Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multicenter Phase III Study
- Date Crossref
- 10/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Dermsquared
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Charles River Laboratories (United States) pays non établi dans la noticeEntreprise
-
Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Delray Medical Center pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Florida Atlantic University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Dermatology Specialists pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
University of Florida pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Florida College pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Cosmetic Laser Dermatology pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Victor Valley College pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Victor (Japan) pays non établi dans la noticeEntreprise
-
Pflugerville Independent School District pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Houston Institute for Clinical Research pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
Charles River Laboratories (United States), Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center et Delray Medical Center, avec 9 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.