A bispecific antibody targeting PD-L1/TNFR2 increases tumor targeting and enhances antitumor efficacy in colorectal cancer
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown limited efficacy in colorectal cancer (CRC), largely due to immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) including regulatory T cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Additionally, the off-target effects of ICIs can reduce drug accumulation in tumor tissues and lead to immune-related adverse events, further compromising their clinical utility. METHODS: Using knob-into-hole technology, we developed ATAPL1, a bispecific antibody targeting both programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (TNFR2). In multiple subcutaneous and orthotopic CRC mouse models, ATAPL1 was evaluated for its tumor targeting, antitumor efficacy, immunomodulatory effects within the TME, and potential combinations with standard chemotherapies. RESULTS: T-cell activation and macrophage function. ATAPL1 also primed long-term immune surveillance, suggesting durable antitumor activity. Furthermore, ATAPL1 overcame chemotherapy resistance and exhibited superior therapeutic effects when combined with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI, compared with either treatment alone. CONCLUSION: These findings support ATAPL1 as a promising dual-targeted therapeutic strategy for CRC. It offers the potential to overcome immune and chemotherapy resistance, reduce off-target effects, and improve treatment outcomes through enhanced immune activation and tumor targeting.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A bispecific antibody targeting PD-L1/TNFR2 increases tumor targeting and enhances antitumor efficacy in colorectal cancer
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2025
- Éditeur
- BMJ
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.