HIV Testing Among Women with Disabilities in Ghana
Rattachement africain : au, Ghana. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Women with disabilities often face unique barriers to accessing healthcare, potentially increasing their vulnerability and reducing engagement with vital health services, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing. This study assessed the prevalence and associated factors of HIV-testing among women with disabilities in Ghana. Cross-sectional data from the 2017–2018 Ghana Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey, encompassing 819 women with disabilities, were analysed both descriptively and inferentially. The overall prevalence of HIV testing was 48.0% (95%CI = 44.6–51.4). Educational attainment, marital status, and geographical region were key determinants of HIV testing uptake. Women possessing a Senior High School or Tertiary level education demonstrated higher odds of HIV testing compared to those with no formal education. Women residing in Greater Accra, Volta, Brong Ahafo, and Upper West regions were more likely to have undergone HIV testing than those in the Western Region. Never-married women exhibited lower odds of HIV testing uptake than their married counterparts. No statistically significant association was found between various disability types and HIV testing uptake. Less than half of women with disabilities in Ghana had ever tested for HIV, highlighting a substantial unmet need and underscoring the urgent need for targeted interventions, including enhanced, region-specific educational and health promotion initiatives, and tailored support for never-married women with disabilities.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- HIV Testing Among Women with Disabilities in Ghana
- Date Crossref
- 12/11/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.