Using Standardized Patient Simulation to Improve Nursing Students’ Perceptions, Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes About People Who Use Drugs and Opioid Overdose Prevention
Rattachement africain : in, Nigéria, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Harm reduction approaches are well-established public health interventions that can reduce mortality associated with substance use. Concepts related to harm reduction and overdose prevention have been virtually absent in the nursing education literature. PURPOSE: This study evaluated changes in nursing students' perceptions toward people who use drugs and knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes about overdose prevention following an opioid overdose prevention workshop utilizing simulation. METHODS: This study used a pre-postintervention design. Measurements included the Drug and Drug Problems Perceptions Questionnaire (DDPPQ), Opioid Overdose Attitudes Scale, and Opioid Overdose Knowledge Scale. RESULTS: A total of 569 students participated in the workshop. Competence and readiness to manage an overdose increased among participants ( P < .01). While each DDPPQ subscale improved, the magnitude of change was most notable for role adequacy. CONCLUSIONS: Educational interventions centering a harm-reductionist approach can improve knowledge and attitudes toward overdose prevention and attitudes toward individuals who use drugs.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Using Standardized Patient Simulation to Improve Nursing Students’ Perceptions, Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes About People Who Use Drugs and Opioid Overdose Prevention
- Date Crossref
- 13/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.