Aller au contenu principal
2025 article

Bone Remodeling After Surgical and Non-Surgical Management of Isolated Zygomatic Arch Fractures

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

PURPOSE: The healing process of isolated zygomatic arch (ZA) fractures is not well understood. This study sought to investigate and compare bony remodeling outcomes following surgical and nonsurgical management of isolated ZA fractures. Through analysis of pre- and post-treatment computed tomography (CT) scans, we aimed to quantify the degree of fracture reduction over time. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study identified subjects presenting to the emergency room with acute isolated ZA fractures between 2011 and 2021 who had both initial post injury and subsequent CT scans of the face. Inclusion criteria required follow-up CT at least 6 months post-injury for nonsurgical patients and at least 1 month for surgical patients. Patients with no measurerable initial fracture displacement or any concurrent facial fractures were excluded. The independent variable was treatment approach (operative vs. nonoperative). The outcome variable was degree of fracture reduction between initial and follow-up CT imaging. Covariates collected included patient age, treatment (operative vs nonoperative) and time to follow-up CT. Bivariate statistical analysis conducted to compare fracture measurements between initial and follow-up, surgical and nonsurgical groups at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: Of 27 patients met study inclusion criteria, 11 (40.7%) underwent surgical reduction and 16 (59.3%) were treated conservatively. The median age at presentation was 48 (IQR 35-64) years old with an average fracture displacement of 0.43 ± 0.2 cm. Both surgical and nonsurgical patients demonstrated significant fracture reduction on follow-up CT ( P < 0.001). In the nonsurgical cohort, the average initial fracture displacement was 0.30 ± 0.16 cm, and fracture reduction averaged 19.9% on follow-up (range 0%-41.7%). For the surgical cohort, the average initial fracture displacement was 0.60 ± 0.09 cm and fracture reduction averaged 63.6% (range 11.6%-100%) on follow-up. While the surgical group had a significantly greater degree of fracture reduction compared with the nonsurgical group ( P < 0.001), there was no significant difference in final fracture displacement between surgical and nonsurgical groups ( P = 0.4). CONCLUSION: Bony remodeling occurs following both surgical and nonsurgical management, where comparable outcomes highlight the importance of thoughtful patient selection.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Bone Remodeling After Surgical and Non-Surgical Management of Isolated Zygomatic Arch Fractures
Date Crossref
13/11/2025
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Facial Trauma and Fracture ManagementTraumatic Ocular and Foreign Body InjuriesReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.