Efficacy of Upadacitinib vs Dupilumab Treatment for Moderate‑to‑Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of Time Spent in Response State From the Level Up Study
Rattachement africain : pt, us, de, cn, jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction & Objectives: Upadacitinib (UPA), a selective oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, and dupilumab (DUPI), a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-4Rα, are both treatments approved for patients with moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD). Results from a phase 3b/4 trial (Level Up NCT05601882) indicated that UPA was superior to DUPI in simultaneously achieving the stringent endpoints of Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) improvement of ≥90% from baseline (EASI 90) and a Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale score of 0/1 (WP-NRS 0/1) at Week 16. In this post-hoc analysis, we analyzed the median time (days) spent in response states based on EASI 90 and/or WP-NRS 0/1 in patients either receiving UPA or DUPI over a 16-week period. Materials & Methods: The Level Up study was a phase 3b/4 head-to-head global, randomized, open-label, efficacy assessor blinded, multicenter study comparing UPA vs DUPI in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD. Patients were randomized to UPA 15 mg or DUPI per its label for 16 weeks of treatment. Patients on UPA 15 mg were dose-escalated to 30 mg starting at Week 4 if they had a
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Efficacy of Upadacitinib vs Dupilumab Treatment for Moderate‑to‑Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of Time Spent in Response State From the Level Up Study
- Date Crossref
- 10/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Dermsquared
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.