The association of brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met polymorphism with stroke outcomes: a cross-sectional pilot study
Résumé fourni par la source
Aim: This study investigated the effect of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met polymorphism on post-stroke outcomes, including quality of life, physical fitness, cognitive function, depression, and overall disability. Methods: The difference between Met carriers and non-Met carriers was analyzed for the entire sample and in pair-matched analysis, using age, sex, time since stroke, and race. Results: We evaluated 89 stroke participants (mean age, 57 ± 10 years; 58% male; 54% White, and 49% Hispanic). Twelve participants (13%) had one copy of the BDNF Val66Met (Val/Met heterozygotes) and none had two copies (Met/Met homozygotes). Comparing Met (n = 12) and non-Met carriers (n = 77), no significant differences were observed in demographics or clinical characteristics, including motor or cognitive outcomes. In pair-matched analysis, a significant difference was observed for the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale, where Met carriers had significantly greater CES-D scores than non-Met carriers (24 ± 16 vs. 9 ± 9, p = 0.011). Regardless of the chosen CES-D cut-off scores (≥ 16 vs. ≥ 20), more cases of depressive symptomatology were observed among those with the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism than those without it (p values < 0.05). Conclusions: The BDNF Val66Met polymorphism may be associated with post-stroke depression but not motor or cognitive recovery.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The association of brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met polymorphism with stroke outcomes: a cross-sectional pilot study
- Date Crossref
- 11/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Open Exploration Publishing
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.