Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Efficacy of combination therapy with oral Ivermectin and topical permethrin versus permethrin monotherapy in pediatric patients with persistent scabies: a propensity score–adjusted observational study

2Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : tr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Scabies is a highly contagious parasitic infestation that disproportionately affects children in resource-limited settings. Topical 5% permethrin is first-line therapy, but effectiveness is limited by suboptimal application, rapid reinfestation, and emerging resistance. Adding oral ivermectin to permethrin has shown promise in small series, yet its cost-28-37% of the 2022 minimum wage in Türkiye before generics and still 5-7% after-puts it beyond reach for many families, with similar gaps in other low-income countries. We conducted a propensity-score-adjusted study comparing ivermectin + permethrin versus permethrin alone in children, aiming to quantify clinical benefit, safety and generate evidence to guide policies enhancing financial access to effective therapy. METHODS: From January 2022 to January 2024, we enrolled 230 children (< 18 years; >15 kg) whose scabies persisted after ≥ 1 permethrin course. After cost counselling, families chose either combination therapy (oral ivermectin at 200 µg/kg on Day 0 and 14 plus permethrin) or continued permethrin monotheraphy. Baseline demographic, socioeconomic and clinical variables were used to derive a propensity score adjusting for non-random treatment allocation. Lesion count and pruritus scale were assessed weekly for 4 weeks then monthly for 3 months; recurrences and adverse events (AEs) were recorded at each visit. RESULTS: Combination therapy significantly accelerated symptom relief (time to 50% pruritus reduction: 7.2 ± 1.8 vs. 9.8 ± 2.1 days; p < 0.001) and yielded higher Week 2/3/4 cure rates (55.0%/75.0%/83.8% vs. 30.0%/55.3%/66.0%). Three-month recurrence was lower with combination therapy (7.1% vs. 17.1%; p = 0.05). Mild, self-limiting adverse events were more common in the combination arm (14.3% vs. 4.3%; p = 0.04), predominantly transient itch flare and headache; no moderate, serious, or treatment-limiting events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In this study adding two oral doses of ivermectin to standard permethrin shortened symptom resolution time, raised cure rates, and halved recurrences, with only modest rise in transient mild AEs. Future randomised trials should couple efficacy with cost-effectiveness analyses and evaluate policy options-generic licensure, unit-tablet dispensing, and insurance reimbursement-to ensure equitable access to this regimen. TRIAL REGISTRIATION: Clinical trial number not applicable.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Efficacy of combination therapy with oral Ivermectin and topical permethrin versus permethrin monotherapy in pediatric patients with persistent scabies: a propensity score–adjusted observational study
Date Crossref
11/11/2025
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Dermatological diseases and infestationsHelminth infection and controlForensic Entomology and Diptera Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.