Role of ultrasound elastography versus ultrasound guided biopsy in detection of cancer prostate
Rattachement africain : Égypte. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Elastography, introduced in the early 1990s, is a high-performing diagnostic tool that enhances conventional B-mode ultrasonography. This study assessed the diagnostic potential of ultrasound (US) elastography for early prostate cancer, using histopathology as the reference. It aimed to evaluate elastography's ability to differentiate benign from malignant prostate lesions and measure its sensitivity and specificity. METHOD: From June 2020 to November 2022, 22 men with prostate lesions were enrolled in a prospective study. These patients, referred from the urology outpatient clinic, had a median prostate-specific antigen of 30.6 ng/mL and a median prostate volume of 65 mL. Strain stiffness was calculated for each lesion and subsequently compared with the corresponding histopathological diagnoses. RESULTS: A stiffness threshold between 35 and 37 kPa demonstrated the optimal discriminatory capacity between benign and malignant lesions, yielding a sensitivity of 83.3%, a specificity of 70%, a positive predictive value of 76.9%, a negative predictive value of 77.7%, and an overall accuracy of 77.2%. CONCLUSION: Elastography is an effective diagnostic tool that enhances B-mode ultrasound specificity for prostate cancer detection. It improves differentiation between benign and malignant lesions and increases the accuracy of prostate biopsy outcomes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Role of ultrasound elastography versus ultrasound guided biopsy in detection of cancer prostate
- Date Crossref
- 11/11/2025
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.