Expert review: current applications and future directions of artificial intelligence in obstetrics
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare, with obstetrics emerging as a field of particularly high potential. This review comprehensively synthesises the current landscape of AI applications in obstetrics, critically evaluating its benefits, challenges and future directions. We conducted a systematic literature search of articles published between January 2020 and July 2025 in the PubMed, Web of Science and IEEE Xplore databases. Our analysis reveals that AI is demonstrating significant utility across the field, revolutionising areas such as prenatal ultrasound diagnosis, electronic fetal monitoring and obstetric surgical assistance. Notably, some predictive models for pregnancy complications like pre-eclampsia have achieved an area under the curve (AUC) >0.9. Despite this promise, persistent challenges include data privacy concerns, a lack of model interpretability, algorithmic bias and unresolved medico-legal issues regarding liability. Ultimately, the successful translation of AI into clinical practice hinges on both technological refinements—such as multimodal data fusion and remote monitoring—and robust governance frameworks. Addressing these ethical, legal and translational hurdles through interdisciplinary collaboration is essential for the responsible integration of AI to improve global maternal and infant health outcomes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Expert review: current applications and future directions of artificial intelligence in obstetrics
- Date Crossref
- 10/11/2025
- Éditeur
- BMJ
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.