Intraspecific Leaf Trait Responses to Habitat Heterogeneity in a Tropical Rainforest
Rattachement africain : lk, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Functional traits provide key insights into plant ecological strategies and responses to environmental heterogeneity, yet the role of intraspecific trait variability (ITV) in tropical rainforests remains underexplored. We examined ITV in six leaf traits—leaf thickness (LT), leaf area (LA), specific leaf area (SLA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), leaf nitrogen content (LNC), and stomatal density (SD)—in saplings of 15 dominant tree species across ridge and valley habitats in a Sri Lankan tropical lowland rainforest. We compared interspecific and intraspecific variation and quantified trait plasticity using the plasticity index. Significant ITV was observed for LT, LA, and SD, with ridge individuals showing smaller, thicker leaves with lower SD. SLA, LDMC, and LNC exhibited no overall habitat-level differences, though species-specific divergent responses were detected. Interspecific variation exceeded ITV for most traits, except for LNC, where ITV accounted for 55% of total variation. Trait plasticity varied among traits, with LNC showing the highest plasticity. These results indicate that individuals adjust leaf traits in response to fine-scale habitat heterogeneity, reflecting shifts in resource-use strategies. Overall, ITV is ecologically meaningful and should be incorporated into community-level studies and ecosystem models to improve predictions of plant community dynamics and ecosystem functioning under environmental change.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Intraspecific Leaf Trait Responses to Habitat Heterogeneity in a Tropical Rainforest
- Date Crossref
- 10/11/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.