Exploring Relationships Between Maternal Characteristics, Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data, and Neonatal Hypoglycemia in Gestational Diabetes Pregnancies Using Probabilistic Modeling

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a frequent metabolic complication during pregnancy that significantly impacts both maternal and neonatal health outcomes regularly resulting in NH. Exploring the interactions between maternal characteristics, neonatal outcomes, and data collected from wearable technologies, such as continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) could potentially enable the development of predictive models and support personalized care. METHODS: = 118 women with GDM) with the aim of discovering interactions between maternal characteristics, CGM-derived features calculated in the 90 days preceding delivery, and neonatal outcomes, particularly NH. The final BN returns a graph and conditional probability tables between inputs and outputs, whose statistical relevance has been quantified via odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: Direct associations were identified between NH and maternal hypertension (OR: 2.13 [1.02, 4.46]), family history for diabetes (OR: 1.43 [0.57, 3.57]), and elevated maternal body mass index (BMI) (OR: 3.59 [1.42, 9.08] comparing lower vs higher BMI categories). Cesarean delivery also influenced NH risk (OR: 2.05 [0.98, 4.28]). Indirect associations involving medication regimens and delivery type were significant. Ethnic disparities emerged, notably higher hyperglycemia among Afro-American patients (OR: 2.91 [1.19, 7.11]), highlighting ethnicity-related variations in glycemic control. Notably, CGM-derived metrics were associated with multiple neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Bayesian network allowed to explore the complex interactions between variables in pregnancies affected by GDM. This framework will be extended with wider data sets to provide valuable insights for clinical decision-making able to mitigate maternal and neonatal risks.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.