Time-dependence of Subsurface Solar Convection Using the Time–Distance Deep-focus Method
Rattachement africain : us, br. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract We reexamine the deep-focus methodology of time–distance helioseismology previously used to estimate the power spectrum of the solar convection at a depth of about 30 Mm, which was found to be significantly weaker than predicted by theory and simulations. The Global Acoustic, Linearized Euler, and Eulerian Lagrangian codes are used to generate ground-truth simulations to evaluate the accuracy of the inferred convective power spectrum. This validation process shows that the power spectrum derived using the time–distance methodology diverges significantly from ground truth beyond spatial scales corresponding to the spherical harmonic degree ℓ = 15–30 because of the limited resolution of helioseismic measurements at that depth. However, the power estimated at larger spatial scales ( ℓ < 15) is sufficiently accurate. We then apply the methodology to solar data selected from throughout Solar Cycle 24 and find some evidence that the magnitude of the convective power changes throughout the Cycle. An average of the convective power across the Solar Cycle reveals a spectrum that is qualitatively similar to previous estimates; broadly speaking, these new measurements are consistent with the previous measurements, though about half an order of magnitude greater. The disagreement between observations of solar convection and the magnitudes predicted by simulations persists.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Time-dependence of Subsurface Solar Convection Using the Time–Distance Deep-focus Method
- Date Crossref
- 04/06/2026
- Éditeur
- American Astronomical Society
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.