Performance of Tunnelled, Noncuffed Central Venous Catheters and PICCs in Infants
Rattachement africain : au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: To examine the performance of tunnelled, noncuffed central venous catheters and small-gauge peripherally inserted central catheters for infants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Single-center, retrospective cohort study analyzing patient records for all patients younger than 12 months who had a tunnelled, noncuffed central venous catheter or small-gauge (≤3 Fr) peripherally inserted central catheter inserted at an Australian pediatric hospital over 4 years (2019-2022). RESULTS: A total of 267 catheters (107 tunnelled, noncuffed central venous catheters and 160 peripherally inserted central catheters) were examined, from device insertion to removal. Median age of infants was 58 days (IQR 86). A change in inserting clinicians' preferences for device selection over the study period was demonstrated, with increasing use of tunnelled, noncuffed central venous catheters. Of all devices, 65.2% (n = 174) were used until the end of prescribed treatment (104 peripherally inserted central catheters [65.0%] vs 70 tunnelled, noncuffed central venous catheters [65.4%]). Rates of central line-associated bloodstream infection (n = 7; 2.6%) and venous thrombosis (n = 5; 1.9%) were low. High rates of occlusion (overall [n = 115; 43.1%]; 76 peripherally inserted central catheters [47.5%] vs 39 tunnelled, noncuffed central venous catheters [36.4%]) and dislodgement (overall [n = 53; 19.8%]; 32 peripherally inserted central catheters [20.1%] vs 21 tunnelled, noncuffed central venous catheters [19.6%]) were evident. However, there is no indication of increased odds of occlusion between the device types. CONCLUSIONS: There was a change in clinician preference from peripherally inserted central catheters to tunnelled, noncuffed central venous catheters, and the removal rate due to complications was similar between devices.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Performance of Tunnelled, Noncuffed Central Venous Catheters and PICCs in Infants
- Date Crossref
- 11/11/2025
- Éditeur
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Queensland Health pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
The University of Queensland Midwifery and Social Work pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Children’s Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Griffith University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Brisbane pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Queensland Health, Midwifery and Social Work — The University of Queensland et Children’s Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, avec 2 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.